![\"Inteligjenca](\"https:\/\/theengineeringreview.com\/\/sq\/wp-content\/uploads\/shared\/surgery-79584_640.jpg\")
“`html<\/p>\n“`html<\/p>\n
Inteligjenca artificiale po transformon gradualisht kirurgjin\u00eb duke p\u00ebrmir\u00ebsuar planifikimin e operacioneve, ndihm\u00ebn n\u00eb koh\u00eb reale dhe madje disa detyra autonome. Megjithat\u00eb, adoptimi i saj sjell rrezik teknologjik, njer\u00ebzor, juridik dhe etik q\u00eb akoma nuk jan\u00eb rregulluar mir\u00eb nga rregulloret aktuale.<\/p>\n
Sistemet e inteligjenc\u00ebs artificiale n\u00eb kirurgji mund t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb gabime n\u00eb diagnostikim ose trajtim, t\u00eb komprometojn\u00eb p\u00eblqimin e informuar t\u00eb pacient\u00ebve ose t\u00eb shkelin privat\u00ebsin\u00eb e tyre. K\u00ebto rrezik vijn\u00eb nga tre burime kryesore: kufijt\u00eb e vet\u00eb mjeteve, gabimet njer\u00ebzore t\u00eb lidhura me p\u00ebrdorimin e tyre, dhe d\u00ebshtimet organizative gjat\u00eb zbatimit t\u00eb tyre. P\u00ebr shembull, nj\u00eb algorit\u00ebm i trajnuar keq mund t\u00eb amplifikoj\u00eb paragjykime t\u00eb ekzistuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat, duke \u00e7uar n\u00eb rekomandime t\u00eb pasdrejta p\u00ebr disa grupe pacient\u00ebsh. Gjithashtu, nj\u00eb kirurg mund t\u00eb besoj\u00eb tep\u00ebr n\u00eb nj\u00eb sugjerim t\u00eb gabuar por t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm t\u00eb mjeteve, duke braktisur k\u00ebshtu gjykimin e vet klinik.<\/p>\n
Kornizat ligjore aktuale, si ato t\u00eb Bashkimit Evropian ose t\u00eb Shteteve t\u00eb Bashkuara, p\u00ebrpiqen t\u00eb rregullojn\u00eb k\u00ebto teknologji duke klasifikuar sistemet sipas nivelit t\u00eb rrezikut t\u00eb tyre. K\u00ebrkesat ndryshojn\u00eb at\u00ebher\u00eb n\u00eb lidhje me testimet, menaxhimin e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave dhe sigurin\u00eb kibernetike. Megjithat\u00eb, k\u00ebto rregullore duket se bien pas ritmit t\u00eb inovacioneve, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht para modeleve q\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb m\u00ebsojn\u00eb dhe t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtaten vazhdimisht. Mbrojtja e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave t\u00eb pacient\u00ebve mbetet gjithashtu nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje kritike. N\u00eb Evrop\u00eb, Rregullorja e P\u00ebrgjithshme p\u00ebr Mbrojtjen e t\u00eb Dh\u00ebnave imponon rregulla t\u00eb ngushta mbi p\u00ebrdorimin e informacioneve mjek\u00ebsore, nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb Shtetet e Bashkuara, dob\u00ebsit\u00eb e ligjit aktual e ekspozojn\u00eb pacient\u00ebt n\u00eb rrezikun e riidentifikimit t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave t\u00eb tyre, edhe pse jan\u00eb anonimizuara.<\/p>\n
P\u00eblqimi i informuar b\u00ebhet m\u00eb i komplikuar me futjen e inteligjenc\u00ebs artificiale. Pacient\u00ebt, shpesh pak t\u00eb njohur me k\u00ebto teknologji, mund t\u00eb zhvillojn\u00eb pritshm\u00ebri t\u00eb pa realiste ose, nga ana tjet\u00ebr, frik\u00eb pa baz\u00eb. Kirurg\u00ebt duhet, prandaj, t\u00eb shpjegojn\u00eb qart\u00eb rolin e mjeteve: a \u00ebsht\u00eb fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb ndihm\u00eb n\u00eb diagnostikim, nj\u00eb udh\u00ebzues navigimi ose nj\u00eb asistent aktiv gjat\u00eb operacionit? Ata duhet gjithashtu t\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruajn\u00eb garantit\u00eb n\u00eb vend, si aft\u00ebsia e tyre p\u00ebr t\u00eb verifikuar dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuar rekomandimet e mjeteve. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, kirurg\u00ebt kan\u00eb detyr\u00ebn t\u00eb informojn\u00eb pacient\u00ebt mbi trajnimin e tyre dhe p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn e tyre me k\u00ebto sisteme.<\/p>\n
\u00c7\u00ebshtja e p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb rast t\u00eb nj\u00eb gabimi mjek\u00ebsor b\u00ebhet m\u00eb e komplikuar me p\u00ebrdorimin e inteligjenc\u00ebs artificiale. Tradicionalisht, kirurgu merr p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi t\u00eb plot\u00eb p\u00ebr vendimet e marra n\u00eb sall\u00ebn e operacionit. Por n\u00ebse nj\u00eb sistem jep nj\u00eb rekomandim t\u00eb gabuar q\u00eb ka shkaktuar nj\u00eb d\u00ebm, kush \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebs? Kirurgu p\u00ebr ta ndjekur at\u00eb, zhvilluesi p\u00ebr nj\u00eb defekt n\u00eb dizajn, ose institucioni p\u00ebr nj\u00eb zbatim neglijent? Gjykatat mund t\u00eb mbajn\u00eb prodhuesit p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebs n\u00ebse nj\u00eb algorit\u00ebm i d\u00ebmtuar ose i testuar keq ka \u00e7uar n\u00eb nj\u00eb gabim. Spitalet, nga ana e tyre, mund t\u00eb gjykohen se jan\u00eb neglijent\u00eb n\u00ebse p\u00ebrdorin nj\u00eb sistem t\u00eb pavlefsh\u00ebm ose t\u00eb mir\u00ebmbajtur keq. Sa i p\u00ebrket kirurgut, ai mbetet i detyruar t\u00eb respektoj\u00eb standardet e kujdesit dhe nuk mund t\u00eb shmang\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsin\u00eb duke faj\u00ebsuar mjeteve.<\/p>\n
Rreziket nuk kufizohen vet\u00ebm n\u00eb gabimet mjek\u00ebsore. nj\u00eb p\u00ebrdorim i gabuar i inteligjenc\u00ebs artificiale mund t\u00eb dob\u00ebsoj\u00eb gjithashtu besimin nd\u00ebrmjet pacientit dhe kirurgut. N\u00ebse pacienti e percepton se vendimet po merren nga nj\u00eb algorit\u00ebm dhe jo nga mjeku i tij, marrdh\u00ebnia e besimit mund t\u00eb dob\u00ebsohet. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, mungesa e transparenc\u00ebs ose nj\u00eb gabim i mjeteve mund t\u00eb d\u00ebmtoj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithmon\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb besim, si ndaj klinicianit ashtu edhe ndaj sistemit t\u00eb sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsis n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr t\u00eb zvog\u00ebluar k\u00ebto rrezik, nevojitet nj\u00eb qeverisje e fort\u00eb. Institucionet sh\u00ebndet\u00ebsore duhet t\u00eb vendosin komitete t\u00eb dedikuara p\u00ebr t\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar sistemet e inteligjenc\u00ebs artificiale para se t\u00eb adoptohen. K\u00ebto komitete duhet t\u00eb sigurojn\u00eb q\u00eb zhvilluesit ofrojn\u00eb udh\u00ebzime t\u00eb plot\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimi, sesione trajnimi dhe udh\u00ebzime sigurie. Monitorimi i vazhduesh\u00ebm i performanc\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb gjithashtu i nevojsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb zbuluar \u00e7do r\u00ebnie ose devijim t\u00eb modelit. Shoq\u00ebrit\u00eb shkencore dhe institutet mjek\u00ebsore kan\u00eb gjithashtu nj\u00eb rol p\u00ebr t\u00eb vendosur standarde p\u00ebr trajnimin dhe certifikimin e kirurg\u00ebve q\u00eb p\u00ebrdorin k\u00ebto mjete.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb fund, bashk\u00ebpunimi nd\u00ebrmjet spital\u00ebve, zhvilluesve dhe rregulluesve \u00ebsht\u00eb thelb\u00ebsor p\u00ebr t\u00eb harmonizuar praktikat dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb garantuar nj\u00eb p\u00ebrdorim t\u00eb sigurt dhe etik t\u00eb inteligjenc\u00ebs artificiale n\u00eb kirurgji. Pa k\u00ebt\u00eb, p\u00ebrparimet teknologjike mund t\u00eb b\u00ebhen n\u00eb shpenzimin e siguris\u00eb s\u00eb pacient\u00ebve dhe cil\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb kujdesit.<\/p>\n
“`<\/p>\n
DOI\u00a0:<\/strong> https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-026-12881-8<\/a><\/p>\n Titre\u00a0:<\/strong> Risk and liability in the deployment of AI systems for surgery: a SAGES white paper<\/p>\n Revue : <\/strong> Surgical Endoscopy<\/p>\n \u00c9diteur : <\/strong> Springer Science and Business Media LLC<\/p>\n Auteurs : <\/strong> Daniel A. Hashimoto; Jayson S. Marwaha; Sharon A. Lee; Steven Schwaitzberg; Mindy N. Duffourc<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" “`html Inteligjenca artificiale n\u00eb kirurgji ngrit sfida t\u00eb m\u00ebdha juridike dhe etike Inteligjenca artificiale po transformon gradualisht kirurgjin\u00eb duke p\u00ebrmir\u00ebsuar planifikimin e operacioneve, ndihm\u00ebn n\u00eb koh\u00eb reale dhe madje disa detyra autonome. Megjithat\u00eb, adoptimi i saj sjell rrezik teknologjik, njer\u00ebzor, juridik dhe etik q\u00eb akoma nuk jan\u00eb rregulluar mir\u00eb nga rregulloret aktuale. Sistemet e inteligjenc\u00ebs… Vazhdoni me leximin e Inteligjenca artificiale n\u00eb kirurgji ngrit sfida t\u00eb m\u00ebdha juridike dhe etike<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,3,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politike","category-shendetesi","category-shkence-dhe-teknologji","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theengineeringreview.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theengineeringreview.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theengineeringreview.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theengineeringreview.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theengineeringreview.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/theengineeringreview.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16,"href":"https:\/\/theengineeringreview.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15\/revisions\/16"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theengineeringreview.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theengineeringreview.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theengineeringreview.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}